[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DotGNU]random question
|
From: |
Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen |
|
Subject: |
RE: [DotGNU]random question |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:03:55 +1300 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j_post [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Saturday, 8 February 2003 11:32 a.m.
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [DotGNU]random question
>
[snip]
>
> OO languages merely make it easier for the programmer to use OO
concepts,
> but
> they can be used with *any* language (not "simulated" either). OOP
didn't
> appear concurrently with OO languages, rather OO languages were
invented
> to
Well that's like saying that declarative languages can be used with
*any* language (like C).
OOP is more than just "structs with methods" and it requires language
level support.
I could write a program in C that works and is implemented like a
functional program but that doesn't mean I'm programming "functionally".
^Tum
- [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]cscc symbol table and random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, CH Gowri Kumar, 2003/02/07
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Aditya P. Bansod, 2003/02/07
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/07
- RE: [DotGNU]random question,
Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen <=
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/08
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, j_post, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, Gopal V, 2003/02/08
- RE: [DotGNU]random question, Thong \(Tum\) Nguyen, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, minddog, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]random question, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/07