[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.5.2 released

From: Robert Johnson
Subject: Fwd: Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.5.2 released
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:35:59 -0800 (PST)

Hello Rhys & Gopal & DotGNU Developers,

I have been hearing that there is a need for a binary
distribution of pnet/treecc for win32. I have compiled
and packaged the latest version (Packed as a zip file)
for native Win32 use. The files are posted here:



I did not know where else I could post these files for
the DotGNU project. If you guys have suggestions as to
where or how I can post these to the main projects
page let me know. The files contain the binaries and
not the setup instructions. I went to the Portable.Net
home page and did not see the windows setup
instructions to create a readme.txt 

Also if the project needs it I can work on a windows
installation of pnet/treecc.

Let me know if in the future you want me to do either
native cygwin or win32 builds of pnet/treecc. I will
be more than happy to do it

Happy Hacking

Bob J 

--- Rhys Weatherley <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Rhys Weatherley <address@hidden>
> To: Gopal V <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.5.2 released
> CC: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:55:06 +1000
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 02:41 pm, Gopal V
> wrote:
> > If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> > > Download:
> >
> > It would be great if the tarballs can be uploaded
> to the
> > website (and to for the sake of the
> gentoo guys . Also I would
> > like to ask for an "official" checksum :)
> I'm uploading the source tarballs to the website cvs
> server right now.  
> md5sum's as follows:
> 5e6185c9534301fc846edf386d3080fb  pnet-0.5.2.tar.gz
> 094b220705db05a8372af4ebd96a2f79 
> pnetlib-0.5.2.tar.gz
> 257b86794204f0859a52c97de7c3843a 
> treecc-0.2.2.tar.gz
> > Could someone show up with the windows packages ?
> .. (at least a zip file
> > with the stuff in it ?)... I don't want it hosted
> on , but
> > elsewhere ..
> We really need a better build/release process for
> the binary packages.  I'm 
> flat out getting the source tarballs ready for the
> release without doing 
> windows binaries as well.
> Cheers,
> Rhys.
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]