[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Getting the latest version?
From: |
Fergus Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Getting the latest version? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 02:41:41 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On 10-Mar-2003, James Michael DuPont <address@hidden> wrote:
> Wow! a denial of service attack!
Well, "attack" is putting it a bit too strongly... as the saying goes,
never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
incompetence :-)
> hey Fergus, did you check out my autostubber results for mercury?
Not until just now. My social life this week-end has been interfering
with my email reading ;-)
It looks like the autostubber is for each DLL generating stubs for
every class *referenced* by that DLL, rather than just generating
stubs for classes *defined* by that DLL. For example array.dll.il.cs
includes a definition for mercury.math.mercury_code, and so does
math.dll.il.cs. That class is defined in math.dll not array.dll,
so presumably the stub for it should be defined only in math.dll.il.cs.
But I guess that is another problem with generating C# stubs:
C# doesn't permit circular references, does it?
So if the DLLs that you are trying to generate stubs for
have interfaces which depend on each other in a cyclic manner,
as is the case for the Mercury DLLs, it might cause problems.
--
Fergus Henderson <address@hidden> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
Re: [DotGNU]Getting the latest version?, Gopal V, 2003/03/10