[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU policies

From: James Michael DuPont
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU policies
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:47:34 -0800 (PST)

--- Gopal V <address@hidden> wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Peter Minten wrote:
> > > > Also it means making the bytecode interpreters accessible.
> > > 
> > > If it "also means" this, then it goes too far IMHO.
> > 
> > I agree. However, the pure rule does not say anything about the
> language
> > functions are written in, it just says functions have to be
> accessible using C.
> > If bytecode interpreters have to be hacked than that is clearly a
> sign that the
> > functions are NOT accessible using C. Let me rephrase:
> All the pnet runtine engine functions are accessible without hacking
> the
> interpreter . We've already demonstrated it with the DGEE program
> which
> runs it inside Goldwater and lets you access it with Apache+XmlRpc
> ...
> And my Scripting ilrun with Python also worked really well for me
> without
> modifying anything in libILEngine.a ..

The swigging of pnet is nothing more than doing something like that
with a bit more flexibility.


James Michael DuPont

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]