[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]pnet/mono packaging conflicts

From: Earnie Boyd
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]pnet/mono packaging conflicts
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:36:47 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Fergus Henderson wrote:

Both DotGNU *and* Mono should use a different name.

Actually, I think you both have the right to use ilasm. If you find an ilasm in ${prefix} during the configure process report it to the user so that the user can decide what to do. Binary packagers should set their packages to suggest the install to /usr/local/mono or /usr/local/DotGNU for 'nix systems and %PROGRAMFILES%\mono or %PROGRAMFILES%\DotGNU for Windows systems.

Powered by SourceForge <>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]