[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:55:35 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 04:25 pm, Gopal V wrote:
> I'm still not sure that the CVM code generation
> is right (obviously). The cvmc_setup for the
> case where INT32 is not native , has a
> CVM_ADJUST(-CVM_WORDS_PER_LONG) , which I find
> very strange. Any comments, Rhys ?.
It's trying to deal with libffi's tendancy to return byte, short, and int
values in a native-sized word. Down-conversion is required. Without libffi,
the stubs generated in int_table.c should do something similar. The negative
adjust shouldn't hurt anything in that particular case.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question, Peter Colson, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question, Gopal V, 2004/10/05
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question, Peter Colson, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question, Gopal V, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Pnet-developers] Porting work remaining question, Peter Colson, 2004/10/06