[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme))

From: James Michael DuPont
Subject: Re: WebScheme (was: Re: Dogus (was: Re: [Visionaries] DG-Scheme))
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 00:47:37 -0700 (PDT)

I like the name. Dogus sounds Bogus.

While you are at it, can you include 
the features of n3? we can use it as a n3/rdf/triples manipulation

--- Peter Minten <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Minten wrote:
> > 
> > I believe a new name for the language is needed, DG-Scheme is
> moving so far from
> > Scheme that it would be confusing to use the word Scheme directly
> in it's name.
> > The best idea I got so far was Dogus (an abbreviation of DotGNU
> Scheme).
> Why do the good ideas always hit just after you send an email? Dogus
> is hereby
> renamed to WebScheme.
> I'm letting go of the goal of making an AOP language. It turns out
> integrating
> AOP in a scripting language that relies heavily on scope and closures
> like
> WebScheme is impossible without making horrible kludges.
> Greetings,
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Visionaries mailing list
> address@hidden

James Michael DuPont

Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]