[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dragora-users] New branch for recipes?
From: |
Synchro |
Subject: |
Re: [Dragora-users] New branch for recipes? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:28:49 -0400 |
Hi Selk, and all dragorians
I am also interested in this, I just find the master branch in the scm
(notabug, and savannah) for recipes made from community, we will follow
the fork, and pull request approach ? or sending a patch to the mailing
list ?
As I understand will be a difference between official recipes and
community recipes, or do I get this wrong ?
Regards
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:02:44 -0300
Matias Fonzo <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:47:58 -0300
> Matias Fonzo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:31:48 +0000
> > Lucas Sköldqvist <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > selk wrote:
> > > > The new branch 'fresh' has been created. Right now, is a copy
> > > > of the 'master' or production branch. It will be better if we
> > > > give priority according to what the main branch needs. For
> > > > recipes coming from the community, perhaps we would need a
> > > > separate repository...
> > >
> > > So it is OK to put a recipe for fossil-scm in
> > >
> > > https://notabug.org/dragora/dragora/src/fresh/recipes/devel
> > >
> > > And then we merge it into master? Or put in master directly?
> > >
> > > I'm a little confused :-)
> >
> > Well.. yes, that's another option, commiting it in master directly,
> > testing, while giving priority to what is missing in the
> > distribution.
> >
> > The idea of the 'fresh' branch was to commit in it, testing, and if
> > it's good add merge into master. But there is no problem, for the
> > sake of the work-in-progress.
> >
> > Sounds good?
> >
> >
>
>