Re: [Dragora-users] Some issues with the Dragora website

[Matias Fonzo]

El 2019-11-13 09:07, Michael Siegel escribió:
> Am 12.11.19 um 22:39 schrieb Matias Fonzo:
> > > > The directory "ISOs" refers to files ending with the extension .iso,
> > > > along with checksums.  This is capitalized respecting the 
> > > > nomenclature
> > > > plus the "s" was added to imply that it can be in plural (more than 
> > > > one
> > > > image).
> > > >
> > > > There should be other people's opinions in case they are confused or 
> > > > do
> > > > not understand it as to try to change it or add more information 
> > > > about
> > > > it, I guess.
> > >
> > > Sure.
> > >
> > > A few more thoughts on this from my side:
> > >
> > > I think that adding an “s” to indicate a plural there is unnecessary. 
> > > I
> > > mean, “ISOs” is more of a sloppy plural for “ISO images” or “ISO 
> > > files”,
> > > isn't it? Also, I'm pretty sure the future manual will clearly state
> > > where to get Dragora installation images from, so you probably won't
> > > have a lot of people wandering around in the rsync repository and
> > > wondering where to find them.
> > >
> > > Additionally, if ISO is referring to the file format, which it is, it
> > > should better not be pluralized, IMO. Debian, for example, has its 
> > > page
> > > about CD and DVD images at https://www.debian.org/CD/, which is
> > > reasonable because it refers to the format or kind of the medium. I'd
> > > say the same holds for ISO images.
> >
> > Yes, I think we can rename it to "iso-images" or "releases", what do 
> > you
> > say?.
>
> It's kind of a tricky question. I think I would not go for “releases”
> because a Dragora release encompasses more than the collection of ISO
> images in that directory, doesn't it? So, if I had to choose one of the
> above, it would be “iso-images”. I would just shorten it to “iso”, but
> that's not really worth arguing about, I'd say.
>
> Now, I've had another look at the structure of the repository at
> http://rsync.dragora.org/ and it seems a bit odd to me that the
> directory containing the ISO images for 3.0 is not inside the “v3”
> directory. I think it would, maybe, make more sense to have it in there
> instead of putting it next to “v3” in the top-level directory. Well, it
> depends on how you're using “v3”. If it's going to be used throughout
> the 3.x release series (which I guess it is), keeping the ISO image
> directory out of it makes sense.

It's all right what you say.  I just moved the iso images to the 
"v3/iso" directory.  The index on the page now points to 
http://rsync.dragora.org/current/iso

Thank you!  :-)