[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dragora-users] License Question
From: |
Matias Fonzo |
Subject: |
Re: [Dragora-users] License Question |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 17:42:59 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Roundcube Webmail/1.4.6 |
Hello John U.,
El 2020-07-09 12:49, John U escribió:
Hello, I'm working on my own fork of Dragora using glibc instead of
musl,
Wow, sounds good!. Please let us know more about your fork, where it
lives, etc. to see if we can help you as I also know there are some
people interested in making Dragora support other C libraries.
however when most of the bootstrap files are listed as Apache 2,
however
the bootstrap script has GPLv3 listed on the version function however
at
the top of the file it's listed as Apache 2. Was wondering if you could
clarify this for me.
That's correct about the Apache License and the GPLv3 License.
The criteria is that we are following the recommendation from GNU for
licenses when the code is small (around 300~, see "Small Programs"
under[1]); the rest (when is not less) applies to the GPLv3 for the code
in Dragora.
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html