Re: [Dragora-users] Proposal: flexible script to create different images

[Matías Fonzo]

El 2022-06-06 11:43, DustDFG escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 3:04 PM DustDFG <dfgdust@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > It seems to me that gcc has linker option -rpath...
>
> Ok. I didn't think -rpath won't have sense.

That linker option is for ld(1).

> First of all, I want to say that I understand why we need tmp system
> but I can't understand where it depends on something that we can't
> pack like darkcrusade.
>
> After processing stage 1 we get tmp system that depends on itself
> only. Yes, we need host system to run it (with chroot) but we can move
> it to another system. It is self-contained like darkcrusade compilers.
> Where am I wrong?

It is not as per se as darkcrusade, because the purpose differs, but if 
it is true that it tries to be self-contained; this could change, if 
Binutils (for example) introduces something that needs to be dynamic 
instead of static, by which I mean that up to here or so far the 
temporal system is built as static.  In this sense, I see darkcrusade as 
more independent.

While the temporary system could be packaged and distributed in order to 
save time in building it (stage 1), it implies more work for us, at the 
same time it can kill the possibility that other people build it under 
other hardware, system and different versions in order to get bug 
reports...