Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity - What's Next?

[Gabriel Ambuehl]

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:08:03 Michael Baierl wrote:
> -) only transfer and store small file sets - duplicity is used a lot in
> environments where data is stored on remote system and the bottleneck is
> the line to the remote system, so transfer should be minimized. Loading
> 100GB over WebDAV to get a 2k config file back is really no option...


IMHO, it should be enough to get the one (possibly n) archive files the files 
resides in to restore the one critical file as long as you have an index in 
each and every one of them (or even just inband data, saying what the next 
file is and for how long it will continue), telling you where exactly the 
file is? AFAICT, the signature db will already be able to tell you what 
archives a given file is stored in?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.