[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] how to tell duplicity to NOT sign (want to encrypt
From: |
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] how to tell duplicity to NOT sign (want to encrypt to public key only) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2008 14:29:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On May 29, 2008 01:23:01 pm Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> If you use
> --archive-dir path
> When backing up or restoring, specify the local archive
> directory. This option is not necessary, but if hash data is found
> locally in path it will be used in preference to the remote
> hash data. Use of this option does not imply that the archive
> data is no longer stored in the backup destination,
> nor that the local archive directory need be kept safe. The local
> archive directory is a performance optimization only, and may
> safely be discarded at any time.
>
> This is neatly solved and allows for unattended public key backups. It's
> potentially a lot faster to boot because you do not need to download the
> signatures at the beginning.
I figured it out. --archive-dir was right, but I had a problem with the keys.
I had to sign the public key with my private key. GnuPG was crapping out
because the key wasn't signed.
-A.