[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key
From: |
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:28:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On October 3, 2008 10:12:47 am Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> If you use --archive-dir=<localdir> then duplicity will not need to
> decrypt the manifest and sig files and should not need the secret key.
> I'm not sure this path has been tested, but it should work.
This exactly how I use it (I encrypt with several keys, only one of which the
duplicity server has the private key for), and it works fine
with --archive-dir.
-A.
- [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key,
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists), 2008/10/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity without Secret Key, Colin Ryan, 2008/10/09