[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API
From: |
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:12:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On October 26, 2008 06:33:30 pm Dan Muresan wrote:
> As long as duplicity compiles and runs (a) without dbus, and (b) with an
> installed, but stopped dbus daemon, there is no issue. Otherwise, it
> becomes harder to install / run it on some servers (or in an embedded
> context). That would be a pity, because duplicity doesn't necessarily
> fall into the "desktop utilities" category.
Those are my *exact* concerns as well. If *runtime* DBus support is optional
(i.e. compiled with dbus support, but dbus isn't running), and *compile time*
DBus support is optional, I think this would be an awesome feature to add.
-A.
- [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Michael Terry, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Serge Wroclawski, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Serge Wroclawski, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Dan Muresan, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API,
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Serge Wroclawski, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] DBus API, Dan Muresan, 2008/10/27