[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upl
From: |
Kris |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http:// |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:46:09 -0400 |
Sorry, I'm asleep, my last post was nonsense. I'm just going to write up a
quick tested patch if it helps, unless you're already tackling this.
Kris
On 2011-11-02, at 9:30 PM, Kris wrote:
> Thanks for your help Michael! It's hugely appreciated. I can confirm that I
> was looking at the same code and saw that the last chunk of a file not
> perfectly divisible will not have an incorrect number of bytes passed in to
> param for the last chunk.
>
> Just to confirm, I believe the value passed to the 'bytes' key should be:
>
> bytes - (chunk_size*(chunk_size-1))
>
> Kris
>
>
>
> On 2011-11-02, at 9:18 PM, Michael Terry wrote:
>
>> On 2 November 2011 19:34, Kris <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I'm taking a look at it again right now. Just a FYI before I dig in, I
>>> removed the volsize cmd line and it did the same thing. The default volsize
>>> is 25MB in duplicity and that's what the tmp file is. The remote file
>>> however is 50 megs. The PoolWorkers split the chunk in to two 25 meg chunks
>>> and uploaded those, which isn't proper.
>>
>> Good debugging work, Kris. This isn't bug 498933 after all, but is
>> instead a bug in 0.6.16 specifically. In that version, the S3 backend
>> got new 'multichunk' support.
>>
>> But it seems to have a bug that when the size of the volume isn't
>> perfectly divisible by the multichunk size, it will upload too much
>> data. I've filed bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/885513
>> about it.
>>
>> For now, I believe you can workaround it with
>> --s3-multipart-chunk-size=1000 (causing duplicity to basically ignore
>> the multipart code).
>>
>> I feel like suggesting that maybe the multipart branch should be
>> backed out until it can be stress tested a bit more? (so far we've
>> noticed this bug and bug 878220 (the one where botobackend.py added a
>> new, uncommon, and unconditional import due to the patch)
>>
>> -mt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Michael Terry, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Michael Terry, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, edgar . soldin, 2011/11/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, edgar . soldin, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, edgar . soldin, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Michael Terry, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://,
Kris <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Michael Terry, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, edgar . soldin, 2011/11/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity 0.6.16 "File XXX was corrupted during upload." to s3+http://, Kris, 2011/11/03