Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.7 slowness

[Kenneth Loafman]

Could you check to see if a ~/.duply-cache/cccc..cc exists with 2 entries inside?  Since you specified the archive-dir in both runs, they should have been in /var/.duply-cache/cccc..cc.  I'm wondering if it somehow reverted to using the default cache location.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Philip Jocks <address@hidden> wrote:

> Am 01.08.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden>:
>
> Just to verify,
> - Are both cache dirs actually in /var/.duply_cache?

yes

> - Are both directories the same size (ls -l /var/.duply_cache)?
> - Same number of entries (ls -l /var/.duply_cache/* | wc -l)?

no, /var/.duply-cache/cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc (the run without —name) is empty, while /var/.duply-cache/duply_zzz_local (with —name) contains:

duplicity-full-signatures.20160630T145847Z.sigtar.gz
duplicity-full.20160630T145847Z.manifest
duplicity-inc.20160630T145847Z.to.20160630T150316Z.manifest
duplicity-inc.20160630T150316Z.to.20160630T150715Z.manifest
duplicity-new-signatures.20160630T145847Z.to.20160630T150316Z.sigtar.gz
duplicity-new-signatures.20160630T150316Z.to.20160630T150715Z.sigtar.gz

Cheers,

Philip