Re: [Duplicity-talk] Archive files permissions, extra logging

[Adam Pribyl]

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk wrote:

> On 11/10/2020 9:14, Adam Pribyl via Duplicity-talk wrote:
> > Is there a way to change the permissions for the archive files created by 
> > duplicity? It looks to me like this is hardcoded into the duplicity as there is
> >
> > def do_backup(action)
> >   ...
> >   os.umask(0o77)
> >   ...
> >
> > so it always creates the files with 600 (only user read/write),
>
> sounds reasonable as we do not want temporary/cache files created which 
> potentially contain private data that are readable to anybody else. why 
> would anybody else then the duplicity user who created them need access 
> to these files?

Maybe I did not used the proper naming for "archive files" - for duplicity 
cache it is probably ok, but for backup files..  I'd like to e.g. have a 
group of users able to extract the files from backups, but I have to 
post-process the archives to add them group readability at least.

> > Extra logging in the
> >
> > def list_current(col_stats):
> >        ...
> >             user_info = u"%s %s %s" % (dup_time.timetopretty(path.getmtime()),
> >                                     path.type,
> >                                     util.ufn(path.get_relative_path()))
> >             log_info = "%s %s %s" % (dup_time.timetostring(path.getmtime()),
> >                                     util.escape(path.get_relative_path()),
> >                                      path.type)
> >             log.Log(user_info, log.INFO, log.InfoCode.file_list,
> >                     log_info, True)
> >
> >
> > but I did not found how to achieve the log_info to be printed. I can not make sens out of 
> > log.Log function "extra" argument...
>
> did you try raising verbosity to 'info' as described on 
> http://duplicity.nongnu.org/vers8/duplicity.1.html ?

Yes, I did play with verbosity. Maybe I expect something different to 
happen, but the line with the file listed via the list-current-files 
remains the same. I thought it would add this extra info to eache line.

> ..ede/duply.net

Thanks anyway

Adam Pribyl