[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:15:42 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:57:01 +0330 (IRT)
> From: Roozbeh Pournader <address@hidden>
>
> That has been the reason I'm suggesting the visual buffer. (I agree that
> logical buffers are also needed, but they are much harder to implement
> smoothly, I believe).
We've beaten this to death in the past, I think. Visual order has
disadvantages, and its advantages are mostly illusions: you simply
move the logical to visual transformation from the display phase to
input phase.
> > Therefore, I'd prefer this case to be handled correctly
> > automatically. I cannot understand why doesn't UTR9 handle the exclam
> > like this by default. Can you tell?
>
> Yes. Exclamation mark is simply a netrual character.
Why does it have to be neutral? Why isn't it treated as weak instead?
- [emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, (continued)
- [emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/18
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Ehud Karni, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Ehud Karni, 2001/01/20
- [emacs-bidi] Unicode Bidi, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Unicode Bidi, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] Unicode Bidi, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/20
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/20