[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:02:36 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> > Given this design, I think that the problem with breaking lines in the
> > presence of explicit embedding controls should not exist.
>
> I was talking about portablity. You recommended the use of explicit marks
> to ensure portablity. I told that many application will not support
> explicit marks, because they say it's hard to implement, and that will
> make the code not portable. You asked about what makes it hard. I told
> the difference.
>
> I was not talking about it being hard or easy to add the support to
> Emacs.
Of course, I understand that. I just took the opportunity to explain
how I think this all will work in Emacs.
However, note that any editor or browser whose display engine works
similarly to Emacs's, will also be free from these problems.
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, (continued)
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/21
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, dov, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/01/19
- Re: [emacs-bidi] status? news?, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/01/19
[emacs-bidi] Re: [emacs-bidi]status? news?, Matan Ninio, 2001/01/18