[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6646: closed (Ido-mode not honouring display-buf

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6646: closed (Ido-mode not honouring display-buffer-reuse-frames)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:44:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:44:02 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6646: Ido-mode not honouring 
has caused the GNU bug report #6646,
regarding Ido-mode not honouring display-buffer-reuse-frames
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

6646: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6646
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Ido-mode not honouring display-buffer-reuse-frames Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:40:14 -0400
This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation,
not to your local site managers!
Please write in English if possible, because the Emacs maintainers
usually do not have translators to read other languages for them.

Your bug report will be posted to the address@hidden mailing list,
and to the gnu.emacs.bug news group.

Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug.  If you can, give
a recipe starting from `emacs -Q':

./emacs -q

M-x ido-mode
M-x make-frame
M-: (setq display-buffer-reuse-frames nil)
C-x b *scratch*
Click on other frame
C-x b *scratch*

The first frame is raised, and *scratch* is not loaded into the second frame.

If Emacs crashed, and you have the Emacs process in the gdb debugger,
please include the output from the following gdb commands:
    `bt full' and `xbacktrace'.
For information about debugging Emacs, please read the file

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#6646: Ido-mode not honouring display-buffer-reuse-frames Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:44:02 +0200
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:38, Nathaniel Flath <address@hidden> wrote:

> yes, it does.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]