[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6528: closed (24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6528: closed (24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string)
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:59:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:57:49 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6528: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
has caused the GNU bug report #6528,
regarding 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

6528: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6528
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:40:19 -0700
The doc string says:
 Optional third arg REQUIRE-MATCH determines whether non-existing
 buffer names are allowed.  It has the same meaning as the
 REQUIRE-MATCH argument of `confirm-after-completion'.
The last sentence is incorrect (meaningless): `confirm-after-completion'
is not a function, and it has no arguments.

In GNU Emacs (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2010-06-21 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include'

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#6528: 24.0.50; `read-buffer' doc string Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:57:49 +0200
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:28, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:

> I imagine that's right. Hopefully someone who knows will confirm. Thx.

It seems obviously correct, so I've committed it to emacs-23.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]