emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5567: closed (`next-window' does not behave as d


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5567: closed (`next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames)
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 02:17:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:15:57 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible 
frames
has caused the GNU bug report #5567,
regarding `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
5567: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5567
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:14:36 -0800 `next-window' and related functions like `display-buffer' say in their docstrings and in the source code comments that an argument of 0 or 'visible will consider windows on visible or visible-or-iconified frames. ¬†However, the actual behavior is to consider only frames on the current terminal. ¬†The attached patch updates the documentation to match the behavior.

Legal note: I have a copyright assignment on file, and my employer, Google, also has a copyright assignment on file.

Attachment: emacs-next-window.txt
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: `next-window' does not behave as documented WRT visible frames Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:15:57 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Version: 24.1

Michael Shields wrote:

> `next-window' and related functions like `display-buffer' say in their
> docstrings and in the source code comments that an argument of 0 or
> 'visible will consider windows on visible or visible-or-iconified
> frames. However, the actual behavior is to consider only frames on the
> current terminal. The attached patch updates the documentation to
> match the behavior.

Thank you for the patch, which is now applied. Sorry for the delay.

> Legal note: I have a copyright assignment on file, and my employer, Google,
> also has a copyright assignment on file.

For the record; your assignment appears to only be for Gnus, not for Emacs.
However, this change is small enough not to need an assignment.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]