[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7216: closed ([bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 9 Apr 2011 22:33:03 -0600
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7216: [bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93
has caused the GNU bug report #7216,
regarding [bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7216: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7216
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:28:44 +0800
>
>
>
>
> BTW: the email  address of the author 'mike' in
> coreutils-5.93/src/sort.c  is invalid~~~.
>
> ---------original email--------
> From: <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:08:53 +0800
> To: <address@hidden>
> Subject: [bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93
>
> dear mike:
>
> may be there's a bug for sort util in coreutil-5.93.bz2.
> Pls see the example below:
>
> =========
> bash#> (echo 1230 1;echo 123 1)|sort -k1
> 1230 1
> 123 1
> bash#> (echo 1230 1;echo 123 0)|sort -k1
> 123 0
> 1230 1
> =========
>
> The result is diffrent,but the first column (-k1) doesn't  change at all.
> As a result, we cannot use JOIN util to get a correct result. :(
>
> I'm not sure if it is my mistake or a bug~~~
>
> beg your reply.  Tks very much
>
>                                                 From: jack
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#7216: [bug report] for sort.c in coreutils-5.93
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 9 Apr 2011 22:33:03 -0600
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
>
>
>
>
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 10/14/2010 08:28 AM, jack alibaba wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if it is my mistake or a bug~~~
> > 
> > Using the new 'sort --debug' feature of coreutils 8.6 shows that the
> > bug is in your usage, and not in sort:
>
> This ticket is quite old now and I believe was already resolved
> satisfactorily at the time but just forgotten.  Therefore I am closing
> it now.
>
> Bob
>
>
> --- End Message ---