emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#9934: closed (24.0.91; `region-active-p' definitio


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#9934: closed (24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:12:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:06 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#9934: 24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #9934,
regarding 24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
9934: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9934
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:12:45 -0700
The definition:
 
(defun region-active-p ()  "..."
  (and transient-mark-mode mark-active))
 
Makes no sense, AFAICT.  The mark *cannot* be active unless
`transient-mark-mode' is non-nil.  The very definitions of "active" mark
and "active" region imply transient mark mode.  When transient mark mode
is off, the region and mark are *never* active - the notion of "active"
does not exist in that context.
 
And since the correct definition: (defun region-active-p () mark-active)
is so trivial, this function should just be removed.
 
When is there ever any reason to test (and transient-mark-mode
mark-active)?  When is that value ever different from just the value of
mark-active?
 

In GNU Emacs 24.0.91.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-10-30 on MARVIN
 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include"
 -I"D:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/include" --ldflags
 -L"D:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/lib"'
 




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#9934: 24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:06 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
> When is there ever any reason to test (and transient-mark-mode
> mark-active)?  When is that value ever different from just the value of
> mark-active?
 
emacs -Q
M-x transient-mark-mode
M-: mark-active RET
C-SPC
M-: mark-active RET


        Stefan


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]