[debbugs-tracker] bug#10953: closed (Potential logical bug in readtokens.c)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:48 -0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10953: Potential logical bug in readtokens.c
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10953,
regarding Potential logical bug in readtokens.c
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10953: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10953
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Potential logical bug in readtokens.c
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:58:59 +0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;	rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I found a potential bug. But I am not sure about it. It looks
> real from the code.
>
> For coreutils 8.15, in file readtokens.c, function readtoken()
>
> If delim is NULL, and saved_delim is not NULL, then the condition on
> line 75 is not satisfied, but the condition on line 79 is satisfied.
>
> In this case, there could be NULL pointer deference for delim[i] in line 84.
>
>
> - Zhongxing Xu
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#10953: Potential logical bug in readtokens.c
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:56:48 -0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;	rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1
>
>
>
>
> On 03/07/2012 11:52 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Here's a proposed readtokens test module:
>
> I took a quick look, and it looks fine, thanks.
>
> The bug's fixed now, so I'm marking it as 'done'.
>
>
> --- End Message ---