[debbugs-tracker] bug#11915: closed (libraries that don't provide a feature or the wrong one)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:38 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11915: libraries that don't provide a feature or the 
wrong one
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11915,
regarding libraries that don't provide a feature or the wrong one
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11915: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11915
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> libraries that don't provide a feature or the wrong one
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:52:47 +0200
>
>
>
>
> * in the emacs-24 branch:
>
> bug-reference.el and map-ynp.el do not provide a feature.
> misearch.el provides `multi-isearch' instead of `misearch'.
>
> userlock.el, patcomp.el, forms-d2.el and forms-pass.el also
> don't provide a feature but it seems this intentional.
> However I think they then should not appear in `packages-builtins'.
> The last two could possibly be added to the forms package.
>
> * in the elpa branch:
>
> markchars.el does not provide a feature.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#11915: libraries that don't provide a feature or the wrong one
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:38 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> >>> * in the emacs-24 branch:
> >>> bug-reference.el and map-ynp.el do not provide a feature.
> >> Looks like a bug in bug-reference.el.
> > This bug does not appear to be fixed yet.
>
> Should be fixed now.
>
> >> For map-ynp.el, I think it's normal because that file is preloaded.
>
> I added:
>
> > ;; Package: emacs
> > to it's header.
>
> >>> misearch.el provides `multi-isearch' instead of `misearch'.
> >> That should be fixed,
> > This does not appear to be fixed yet.
>
> Should be fixed now.
>
> >>> userlock.el, patcomp.el, forms-d2.el and forms-pass.el also
> >>> don't provide a feature but it seems this intentional.
> >> userlock should arguably be preloaded.
> > Then it should also not be an "independent package" but be part of the
> > "emacs" package just like `map-ynp.el'.
>
> Done.
>
> >> patcomp.el is obsolete and not worth fixing,
> > Shouldn't it be moved to lisp/obsolete then (or since it was only used by
> > maintainers removed right away)?  Also it should not appear in
> > `package--builtins'.
>
> It's already been moved to obsolete in trunk a while ago.
>
> >>> However I think they then should not appear in `packages-builtins'.
> >> You might be right (at least the etc/forms/*.el files shouldn't be
> >> there), tho I'm not sure how important this is.
> > It would be easy to make them part of the `forms' package.
>
> Oh, I see, you're looking at the 24.1 code, but in the trunk these files
> have been moved to "etc/forms" so they should not be a problem any more.
>
> >>> * in the elpa branch:
> >>> markchars.el does not provide a feature.
> >> That's an oversight, yes, thank you,
> > This does not appear to be fixed yet.
>
> Should be fixed now.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> --- End Message ---