emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#12664: closed (Not possible to list directories re


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#12664: closed (Not possible to list directories recursiv (-d switch ignores -R))
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:46:03 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:44:12 -0600
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12664: Not possible to list directories recursiv (-d 
switch ignores -R)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12664,
regarding Not possible to list directories recursiv (-d switch ignores -R)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12664: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12664
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Not possible to list directories recursiv (-d switch ignores -R) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:01:14 +0200 User-agent: KMail/4.9.2 (Linux/3.5.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.9.2; x86_64; ; )
Documentation says the following:

-d, --directory :: list directory entries instead of contents, and do not 
dereference symbolic links

and

-R, --recursive :: list subdirectories recursively

And this is what i get when i use ls -dR /

$ ls -dR /
/

I even tried

ls -d --recursiv -R -R -R -RRRRRRRRRRR /
/

The -R switch stand-alone works fine

Im using the coreutils 8.19 package from Archlinux



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#12664: Not possible to list directories recursiv (-d switch ignores -R) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:44:12 -0600 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121009 Thunderbird/16.0
tag 12664 notabug
thanks

On 10/17/2012 12:01 PM, Vamp898 wrote:
> Documentation says the following:
> 
> -d, --directory :: list directory entries instead of contents, and do not 
> dereference symbolic links
> 
> and
> 
> -R, --recursive :: list subdirectories recursively
> 
> And this is what i get when i use ls -dR /
> 
> $ ls -dR /
> /

Thanks for the report.  However, POSIX require -d to treat directories
as files rather than directories, and says that mixing -d and -R is
unspecified:

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls.html
> -d
>     Do not follow symbolic links named as operands unless the -H or -L 
> options are specified. Do not treat directories differently than other types 
> of files. The use of -d with -R produces unspecified results.

In GNU, we take this to mean that -d always overrides -R, because
recursion makes sense only if you treat a directory as a directory, but
-d says to treat it as a file instead.

If you need to mix recursion with listing of directories, consider using
find(1), as in:

find . -type d

or with specific ls options:

find . -type d -exec ls -ld {} +

As such, I'm closing this as not a bug; but you are free to still add
comments or questions to this conversation.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]