[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#13353: closed (Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#13353: closed (Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken)
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:03:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:02:14 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13353: Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13353,
regarding Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

13353: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13353
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:45:52 +0200
I've tried to update coreutils version used in OpenEmbedded. I've been
building for x86, arm, and mips architectures. Coreutils-8.19 builds
fine for all three, but 8.20 fails on mips with lots of "unable to
emulate 'TI'" errors and "right whift count >= width of type" warnings
from src/factor.c. First error comes from line 766.

 - ML

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#13353: Coreutils-8.20 mips build broken Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:02:14 +0000 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 01/04/2013 04:23 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
On 4 January 2013 14:12, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:

So could you try the following patch.

diff src/longlong.h.orig src/longlong.h
< #if (defined (__mips) && __mips >= 3) && W_TYPE_SIZE == 64
#if (defined (__mips) && __mips >= 3) && W_TYPE_SIZE == 64 && defined


  Yes, that works. Thank you.

OK cool.
I think I'll use this more general patch instead.


diff --git a/src/factor.c b/src/factor.c
index 473eee7..95451a5 100644
--- a/src/factor.c
+++ b/src/factor.c
@@ -118,7 +118,14 @@

-# define USE_LONGLONG_H 1
+/* With the way we use longlong.h, it's only safe to use
+   when UWtype = UHWtype, as there were various cases
+   (as can be seen in the history for longlong.h) where
+   for example, _LP64 was required to enable W_TYPE_SIZE==64 code,
+   to avoid compile time or run time issues.  */
+#  define USE_LONGLONG_H 1
+# endif


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]