emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#13424: closed (Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 2


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#13424: closed (Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 24.3 looks like bitmaps)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:37:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:36:00 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13424: Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 24.3 looks 
like bitmaps
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13424,
regarding Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 24.3 looks like bitmaps
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13424: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13424
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 24.3 looks like bitmaps Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:08:28 +0900
Hi,

In the trunk of Emacs 24.3, I cannot seem to get anti-aliased font rendering. I've tried customizing, etc. but nothing seems to work. Is this a known problem and if so, is there a fix?

I've attached a screenshot of 24.3 and 24.3 side by side to illustrate what I am talking about.

Thanks
Sudhir

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#13424: Mac OSX - font rendering in Emacs 24.3 looks like bitmaps Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:36:00 +0100
Hello.

13 jan 2013 kl. 03:08 skrev Sudhir Shenoy <address@hidden>:

> Hi,
> 
> In the trunk of Emacs 24.3, I cannot seem to get anti-aliased font rendering. 
> I've tried customizing, etc. but nothing seems to work. Is this a known 
> problem and if so, is there a fix?
> 
> I've attached a screenshot of 24.3 and 24.3 side by side to illustrate what I 
> am talking about.

I assume you mean something else than "24.3 and 24.3"?  There is no "trunk of 
24.3", it is just the trunk or the emacs-24 branch or a released version.  Not 
sure what versions you mean here.

Anyway, both your versions are antialiased as is plainly seen if you zoom in on 
a character so you see the individual pixels.  I suspect one of them is not 
LCD-smoothed though.  See bug 11484 
(http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11484).

If another workaround for that bug can be found, smoothing will be turned back 
on.

Closing, as this is not a bug.

Thanks,

        Jan D.




--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]