|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#17325: closed (24.3.90; can not font-lock @ function) |
Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2014 05:05:03 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:04:23 +0800 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#17325: 24.3.90; can not font-lock @ function has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17325, regarding 24.3.90; can not font-lock @ function to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 17325: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17325 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 24.3.90; can not font-lock @ function Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:55:08 +0800 Try this code snippet in emacs-lisp-mode and you should see the function name after @ not font-locked: (defun address@hidden () )
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#17325: 24.3.90; can not font-lock @ function Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:04:23 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (CentOS 6.5) Fixed in 24.3.91 On 2014-04-24 09:20 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > It makes no difference, but this style was very common. It's probably > because syntax strings are "positional" (the first char has a meaning, > the second another one, the rest yet another) so using "' " is saying > explicitly "no p/b/1/2/3/4". Thanks for this info. Leo
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |