|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#17458: closed (minor dfa.c suggestion) |
Date: | Sun, 11 May 2014 03:17:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2014 20:16:04 -0700 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#17458: minor dfa.c suggestion has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17458, regarding minor dfa.c suggestion to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 17458: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17458 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: minor dfa.c suggestion Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 06:06:10 +0300 User-agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 Hi guys. Since dfa.h now include <stdbool.h>, you don't need to do it in dfa.c Arnold
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#17458: minor dfa.c suggestion Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 20:16:04 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Aharon Robbins wrote:Since dfa.h now include <stdbool.h>, you don't need to do it in dfa.cThanks. stddef.h too. I pushed the attached patch.0001-dfa-omit-double-includes.patch
Description: Text document
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |