--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
24.3.92; pos-visible-in-window-p with PARTIALLY is wrong for the first row only containing a single image |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jul 2014 08:38:26 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
Steps to reproduce:
1. $ emacs -Q &
2. Type the following expression and hit C-j in the *scratch* buffer.
(save-excursion
(goto-char (point-min))
(insert-image (create-image "splash.png"))
(insert ?\n))
3. Ditto.
(pos-visible-in-window-p (point-min) nil t)
Result:
The expected one is (0 0), but the actual one is (608 188). As far as
I tested, this happens at the first row (i.e., (window-start)) only
containing a single image. If you remove (insert ?\n) in the first
expression, then the result is (0 0) as expected.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
In GNU Emacs 24.3.92.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.2.0, GTK+ Version 3.12.2)
of 2014-07-05 on YAMAMOTO-no-iMac.local
Repository revision: 117350 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11406000
Configured using:
`configure --without-imagemagick LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib
CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#17942: 24.3.92; pos-visible-in-window-p with PARTIALLY is wrong for the first row only containing a single image |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jul 2014 10:39:59 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 08:38:26 +0900
> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
>
> 1. $ emacs -Q &
> 2. Type the following expression and hit C-j in the *scratch* buffer.
>
> (save-excursion
> (goto-char (point-min))
> (insert-image (create-image "splash.png"))
> (insert ?\n))
>
> 3. Ditto.
>
> (pos-visible-in-window-p (point-min) nil t)
>
> Result:
>
> The expected one is (0 0), but the actual one is (608 188). As far as
> I tested, this happens at the first row (i.e., (window-start)) only
> containing a single image. If you remove (insert ?\n) in the first
> expression, then the result is (0 0) as expected.
Fixed in revision 117352 on the emacs-24 branch.
--- End Message ---