[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#18495: closed ([PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#18495: closed ([PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:42:49 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#18495: Alternatives!?!
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18495,
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

18495: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18495
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:32:35 +0200
* libguile/smob.h (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC): This elementary API macro has
  been broken by commit 56164dc47f6616b359f0ad23be208f01a77b55fa in 2009

Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
 libguile/smob.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libguile/smob.h b/libguile/smob.h
index 60abe37..e787cb1 100644
--- a/libguile/smob.h
+++ b/libguile/smob.h
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ scm_new_double_smob (scm_t_bits tc, scm_t_bits data1,
 #define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT(x)             (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1 (x))
 #define SCM_SET_SMOB_OBJECT(x,obj)     (SCM_SET_SMOB_OBJECT_1 ((x), (obj)))
-#define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC(x)         (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC (x)))
+#define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC(x)         (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC (x))
 #define SCM_SMOB_APPLY_0(x)            (scm_call_0 (x))

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#18495: Alternatives!?! Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:42:49 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> * libguile/smob.h (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_0_LOC)
>   (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_3_LOC):  These elementary API macros have been broken
>   by commit 56164dc47f6616b359f0ad23be208f01a77b55fa in 2009

Ouch.  I've pushed this to stable-2.0, commit
8442211ef0029581b35f784489afcf210491fc41.  I'm closing this bug.

> will there be something like an official guarantee that using
> the undocumented SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC will be supported for several
> years?

I think that's the best option.  Just use SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]