[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#18930: closed (install-data-local fails with 2.4.3

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#18930: closed (install-data-local fails with 2.4.3)
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:10:03 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:09:39 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#18930: install-data-local fails with 2.4.3
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18930,
regarding install-data-local fails with 2.4.3
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

18930: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18930
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: install-data-local fails with 2.4.3 Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:19:28 +1000 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
With the 2.4.3 release, I can no longer run "make
DESTDIR=/install/install-data-local".  I get the following error:

GREP='/usr/bin/grep' SED='/usr/bin/sed' './build-aux/inline-source'
libtoolize > '/install/usr/bin/libtoolize';
/bin/sh: /install/usr/bin/libtoolize: No such file or directory

It looks like install-data-local requires libtoolize to be installed and
should depend on install-binSCRIPTS.  Or even better, do not adjust
libtoolize if it has not been installed (useful for installing libltdl
files separately).


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#18930: install-data-local fails with 2.4.3 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:09:39 +0000
Hi Allan,

> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Allan McRae <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just to note there was a typo in my command:
> make DESTDIR=/install/ install-data-local
> So it is a "make install" type operation.  It is also replicable on
> current master.
> I have just looked at the error...
> /bin/sh: /install/usr/bin/libtoolize: No such file or directory
> I am assuming this is because the /install/usr/bin directory has not
> been made yet.

Thanks for persevering with me.  Yes, you are quite right!

I pushed a fix just now, so the next release will behave correctly again.

Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]