emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#19121: closed (AUCTeX should report an error if se


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#19121: closed (AUCTeX should report an error if selected viewer fails)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:03:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:02:06 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] bug#19121: bug#19121: AUCTeX should report an 
error if selected viewer fails
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19121,
regarding AUCTeX should report an error if selected viewer fails
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19121: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19121
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: AUCTeX should report an error if selected viewer fails Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:07:30 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
Package: auctex
Version: 11.83
Severity: normal
Usertags: bugs.debian.org/409795

Neither `C-c C-c', nor `C-c C-v', nor `tool-bar view' appear to report
any error if the viewer selected by `TeX-view-program-selection' isn't
installed.

It would be useful if AUCTeX would check if the selected viewer is
installed on the system, falling back to some other viewer if available;
at a minimum, however, AUCTeX should give some clue to the user about
the failure to start a viewer.

This bug has been originally reported by a Debian user: see
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409795>, in
particular items marked `0' and `2' by the original submitter.

-- 
Thanks,
Davide



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] bug#19121: bug#19121: AUCTeX should report an error if selected viewer fails Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:02:06 +0100
Patch fixed (the original one didn't really work with a list of
executables) and installed.

Bye,
Mosè


2014-11-25 16:49 GMT+01:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti <address@hidden>:
>>>>>>  MG == Mosè Giordano [2014-11-24]
>
> [...]
>
> MG> Does someone have other suggestions?
>
> Hi Mosè,
>
> I reviewed your patch; I could not come up with anything better, and
> while it does have some drawbacks[1], it is indeed an improvement over
> the current situation, thanks!
>
> Footnotes:
> [1]  Beside the need to fiddle with a much customized variable, your
> patch only checks if the executable exists, but it won't notice run-time
> failures.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Davide
>


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]