[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#19641: closed ('guix environment' sometimes incorr

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#19641: closed ('guix environment' sometimes incorrectly handles inputs)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:23:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:22:37 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19641: guix environment
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19641,
regarding 'guix environment' sometimes incorrectly handles inputs
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

19641: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19641
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: guix environment Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:43:44 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
Federico Beffa <address@hidden> skribis:

> I believe that "guix environment" does not consider all outputs
> properly. As one example, when I execute:
> guix environment libpeas
> the $PATH doesn't include /gnu/store/...glib-2.42.1-bin/bin where
> ("glib:bin" ,glib "bin") is one of the native-inputs of the package.
> Is this intentional?

I don’t think so.

On closer inspection, I see two issues:

  (define (packages->transitive-inputs packages)
    "Return a list of the transitive inputs for all PACKAGES."
    (define (transitive-inputs package)
      (filter-map (match-lambda
                   ((_ (? package? package)) package)
                   (_ #f))    ; <---- !
                   (package->bag package))))
     (append-map transitive-inputs packages)))

Here only inputs of the form ("foo" PKG) are considered; things like
("glib" ,glib "bin") are discarded.

  (define (for-each-search-path proc inputs derivations pure?)
    (let ((paths (map derivation->output-path derivations))) ; <-- !

Above, ‘derivation->output-path’ considers only the “out” output,
ignoring others if they are needed.

I think these would need to be adjusted.  Any takers?  :-)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#19641: guix environment Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:22:37 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
AFAIK the problem that Federico reported is fixed by 4b7ad2e3, so I’m
closing this bug, and opening a new one for the other issue I raised.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]