[debbugs-tracker] bug#19719: closed (grep(1) man page for GNU grep 2.16 shold have PCRE but has PRCE )

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:43:13 -0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19719: grep(1) man page for GNU grep 2.16 shold have 
PCRE but has PRCE
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19719,
regarding grep(1) man page for GNU grep 2.16 shold have PCRE but has PRCE 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19719: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19719
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: grep(1) man page for GNU grep 2.16 shold have PCRE but has PRCE Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:12:19 +0000

There is one instance of PRCE. It should be PCRE.  That would help the reader seeking PCRE.

Philip Muench
address@hidden
700 West Johnson Avenue Cheshire, CT06410 www.fibermountain.com		P. (203) 806-4040 C. F. (845) 358-7882
Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the above named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are expressly prohibited from copying, distributing, disseminating, or in any other way using any information contained within this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by telephone or by response via mail. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on this message, as well as any attachments. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#19719: grep(1) man page for GNU grep 2.16 shold have PCRE but has PRCE
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:43:13 -0800
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Philip Muench
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > There is one instance of PRCE. It should be PCRE.  That would help the reader 
> > seeking PCRE.
>
> Thank you for reporting that.
> However, there has never been an occurrence of the string PRCE in the
> upstream sources, so this is probably due to a distribution-specific patch
> in use on your system.  Also note that there have been significant fixes
> and improvements since grep-2.16.  The latest is grep-2.21.
>
>
> --- End Message ---