[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#20411: closed (24.3; Docstring of `next-single-pro

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#20411: closed (24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change')
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:29:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:28:16 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#20411: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20411,
regarding 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

20411: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20411
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change' Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:08:01 -0400
The documentation for `next-single-property-change' has:

  Return nil if the property is constant all the way to the end of
  object.  If the value is non-nil, it is a position greater than
  position, never equal.

Both of these are wrong when a bound is given.

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#20411: 24.3; Docstring of `next-single-property-change' Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:28:16 +0300
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:29:55 -0400
> From: Eli Barzilay <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> So I still think that it's confusing -- maybe "except when LIMIT is
> non-nil" and possibly a warning that this is different from the
> searching functions?

Thanks, I clarified the doc strings of this and similar functions in
this respect.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]