emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#19407: closed (`vc-dir' not usable under Subversio


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#19407: closed (`vc-dir' not usable under Subversion)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:11:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:10:31 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19407: `vc-dir' not usable under Subversion
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19407,
regarding `vc-dir' not usable under Subversion
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19407: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19407
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: `vc-dir' not usable under Subversion Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:45:57 +0000
Now that I can actually get a `vc-dir' buffer for a Subversion working
directory, I notice that none of the commands work. For example,
moving point over a file's entry in the list and pressing RET finds
the wrong file.

E.g., if "test.txt" is at revision 17501 then it finds
"c:\projects\test\     17501   test.txt" instead of
"c:\projects\test\test.txt".

Works OK under Git as far as I can see.

In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
 of 2014-12-18 on 80461UHB
Repository revision: 687ae680bd12b0353e313808253e7a07c0828ebe
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --prefix /c/emacs/emacs-20141218-135134
 --disable-dependency-tracking
 --enable-locallisppath=%emacs_dir%/../site-lisp --with-wide-int
 --build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 'CFLAGS=-g -ggdb' 'CPPFLAGS=-I
 G:/usr/include -I C:/GnuWin32/include' 'LDFLAGS=-L G:/usr/lib -L
 C:/GnuWin32/lib''



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#19407: `vc-dir' not usable under Subversion Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:10:31 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
I think this has been fixed together with debbugs.gnu.org/19429, which
was a duplicate.

Richard, if you're still seeing the problem please let us know.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]