emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#20455: closed (elisp-completion-at-point not compa


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#20455: closed (elisp-completion-at-point not compatible replacement for lisp-completion-at-point)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:30:05 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:29:29 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#20455: elisp-completion-at-point not compatible 
replacement for lisp-completion-at-point
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20455,
regarding elisp-completion-at-point not compatible replacement for 
lisp-completion-at-point
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
20455: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20455
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: elisp-completion-at-point not compatible replacement for lisp-completion-at-point Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 02:57:39 -0400 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Package: emacs
Version: 25.0.50


In Emacs 24.5:
(lisp-completion-at-point &optional PREDICATE)
   ; PREDICATE is unused, but I don't see that this affects the following


In current master:
lisp-completion-at-point is an alias for `elisp-completion-at-point'.


But elisp-completion-at-point takes no arguments.
Therefore this is an incompatible change.

This is presumably why attempting to use lisp-complete-symbol throws a
wrong-number-of-arguments error.

(Why doesn't the byte-compiler warn about this arglist mismatch?)




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#20455: elisp-completion-at-point not compatible replacement for lisp-completion-at-point Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:29:29 +0200 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0
Version: 25.1

On 04/30/2015 12:17 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:

Exactly, make it into a wrapper,

Done, in 50b8c55.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]