emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#22054: closed (Potential errors in package--builti


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#22054: closed (Potential errors in package--builtins)
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:38:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:08 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#22054: Potential errors in package--builtins
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22054,
regarding Potential errors in package--builtins
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
22054: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22054
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Potential errors in package--builtins Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:24:44 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 25.0.50.1
* `ielm' is missing from the list.  I suspect it is not detected as a
  package because the first line does not contain the summary.  Also,
  shouldn't the "interaction mode for Emacs Lisp" be located inside
  lisp/emacs-lisp/?

* `cl-preload' is listed as a separate package.  That might be
  intentional but wouldn't it make more sense to make it part of
  the `cl-lib' package?

* `eieio-compat' is listed as a separate package.  But I suspect that
  is intentional.  Not sure though.

* `sasl-scram-rfc' is listed as a separate package, but all the other
  `sasl-*' libraries are part of the `sasl' package.

This is for the `emacs-25' branch.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#22054: Potential errors in package--builtins Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:37:08 +0000
> Since nobody said anything about the other entries you mentioned being
> intentional, I'll fix them too and we'll see if anyone yells. :)

Fixed in emacs-25


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]