emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#21191: closed (Obsolete eudcb-ph.el)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#21191: closed (Obsolete eudcb-ph.el)
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 03:05:03 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:04:33 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#21191: Obsolete eudcb-ph.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21191,
regarding Obsolete eudcb-ph.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
21191: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21191
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Obsolete eudcb-ph.el Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:53:00 -0400 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Package: emacs
Version: 24.5
Severity: wishlist

I doubt CCSO PH/QI has seen much/any use in at least the past decade,
so I suggest obsoleting eudcb-ph.el (and making eudc basically an ldap
client. Well, I see there's also bbdb and a never-documented or
announced AddressBook backend.)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#21191: Obsolete eudcb-ph.el Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:04:33 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
fixed 21191 25.1
thanks

Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:

> Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
>> Makes sense.  I'll work on this.  I didn't see a specific set of
>> instructions in admin or CONTRIBUTE for how to obsolete an elisp file,
>> so I'll try to follow the procedures that were used for some other
>> recently-obsoleted files.
>
> Thanks. Basically just: move the file to the lisp/obsolete directory,
> add an "Obsolete-since" header, mention this in NEWS, and remove it from
> the manual.

Done.  Let me know if I missed anything.

>> I also noticed eudc-bob.el; I'm not sure what it does or if anyone uses
>> it.  Any thoughts on that one?

I noticed references to this in the manual.  I think it might still be
useful for LDAP results.  I left it in for now, until I get a chance to
try it.

Thomas


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]