[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#24107: closed (25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-si

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#24107: closed (25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-size are reported inconsistently on w32)
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 12:31:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:30:32 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#24107: 25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-size are 
reported inconsistently on w32
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24107,
regarding 25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-size are reported inconsistently on 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

24107: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24107
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-size are reported inconsistently on w32 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:59:29 +0300
 emacs -Q
 M-: (frame-geometry) RET

When I do this on MS-Windows, I get

  ... (menu-bar-size 672 . 19) ... (tool-bar-size 680 . 36) ...

which looks incorrect, because the width of both is the same.  I think
the width of the menu bar is the correct one.  The reason I think that
is that when I disable the scroll bars, the width reported for the
menu bar is exactly the window-body-width plus the 16 pixels used up
by the fringes.

In GNU Emacs 25.1.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2016-07-29 built on HOME-C4E4A596F7
Repository revision: b275cc76f0c5ab49e81445fcc3420c8772aefd42
Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 'configure --prefix=/d/usr --enable-checking=yes,glyphs --with-wide-int
 --with-modules 'CFLAGS=-O0 -gdwarf-4 -g3''

Configured features:

Important settings:
  value of $LANG: ENU
  locale-coding-system: cp1255

Major mode: Lisp Interaction

Minor modes in effect:
  tooltip-mode: t
  global-eldoc-mode: t
  electric-indent-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  tool-bar-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  blink-cursor-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Recent messages:
For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a.

Load-path shadows:
None found.

(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message dired format-spec rfc822 mml
mml-sec password-cache epg epg-config gnus-util mm-decode mm-bodies
mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail
rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util help-fns help-mode easymenu
cl-loaddefs pcase cl-lib mail-prsvr mail-utils time-date mule-util
tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type
mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table w32-win w32-vars term/common-win
tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment
elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer
select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core
frame cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan
thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian
slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese charscript
case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer
cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files
text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule
custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote w32notify w32 multi-tty
make-network-process emacs)

Memory information:
((conses 16 93479 7177)
 (symbols 56 20753 0)
 (miscs 48 46 128)
 (strings 16 17774 5347)
 (string-bytes 1 441649)
 (vectors 16 12447)
 (vector-slots 8 432686 5016)
 (floats 8 162 106)
 (intervals 40 266 121)
 (buffers 856 21))

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#24107: 25.1; menu-bar-size and tool-bar-size are reported inconsistently on w32 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:30:32 +0200
Yes, thanks.

Installed on master.  Bug closed.

Thanks for spotting this blatant discrepancy, martin

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]