|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#24342: closed (Typo in manual?) |
Date: | Fri, 02 Sep 2016 08:14:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:13:06 +0200 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#24342: Typo in manual? has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24342, regarding Typo in manual? to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 24342: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24342 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Typo in manual? Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:28:52 -0400 I was reading https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Nil.html#Nil and noticed that the last code section uses deffn.Is this correct? Since it's intended to be an elisp function, shouldn't it be 'defun'?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#24342: Typo in manual? Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:13:06 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) On Wed 31 Aug 2016 06:28, Wilfred Hughes <address@hidden> writes: > I was reading > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Nil.html#Nil and > noticed that the last code section uses deffn. > > Is this correct? Since it's intended to be an elisp function, > shouldn't it be 'defun'? I think it's a typo, texinfo uses @deffn to define functions, probably just a thinko. Fixed, tx :) Andy
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |