emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#24605: closed (Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point mig


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#24605: closed (Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point might fail for some THINGS)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:54:01 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:53:48 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line bug#24605: Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point might fail for some 
THINGS
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24605,
regarding Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point might fail for some THINGS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
24605: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24605
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point might fail for some THINGS Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:22:39 +0900 (JST) User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

Because `thing-at-point' doesn't return always a string, as
`form-at-point' currently assumes.  It might return a different
type depending on what you have in
(get thing 'thing-at-point)

emacs -Q:

(with-temp-buffer
  (require 'thingatpt)
  (insert "1")
  (let ((res
         (cond ((and (number-at-point)
                     (form-at-point 'number)) 0)
               ((and (number-at-point)
                     (not (form-at-point 'number))) -1)
               ((and (not (number-at-point))
                     (form-at-point 'number)) -2)
               ((and (not (number-at-point))
                     (not (form-at-point 'number))) -3))))
    (pcase res
      ('0 (message "OK, both 'number-at-point and 'form-at-point successfull"))
      (-1 (message "'number-at-point' works but (form-at-point 'number) fails"))
      (-2 (message "(form-at-point 'number) works but 'number-at-point' fails"))
      (-3 (message "Both 'number-at-point' and (form-at-point 'number) 
fails")))))
=> "’number-at-point’ works but (form-at-point ’number) fails"

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
From d587d00fc1379b8bd2511d5491c0c664669fef87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:48:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] form-at-point work for all kind of THINGS

* lisp/thingatpt.el (form-at-point):
Use thing-at-point--read-from-whole-string only if thing-at-point
returns a string (Bug#24605).
---
 lisp/thingatpt.el | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/thingatpt.el b/lisp/thingatpt.el
index df5c52d..304df7b 100644
--- a/lisp/thingatpt.el
+++ b/lisp/thingatpt.el
@@ -586,9 +586,11 @@ 'read-from-whole-string
   "This is an internal thingatpt function and should not be used.")

 (defun form-at-point (&optional thing pred)
-  (let ((sexp (ignore-errors
-               (thing-at-point--read-from-whole-string
-                (thing-at-point (or thing 'sexp))))))
+  (let* ((obj (thing-at-point (or thing 'sexp)))
+         (sexp (ignore-errors
+                 (if (stringp obj)
+                     (thing-at-point--read-from-whole-string obj)
+                   obj))))
     (if (or (not pred) (funcall pred sexp)) sexp)))

 ;;;###autoload
--
2.9.3

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.0)
 of 2016-10-04 built on calancha-pc
Repository revision: 74b4f13842f3119f98797ea76d9be42457b330e1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: bug#24605: Subject: 25.1.50; form-at-point might fail for some THINGS Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:53:48 +0900 (JST) User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)

Noam Postavsky <address@hidden> writes:

Looks good to me.

Pushed fix to master as commit 9640e9f4



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]