|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#24468: closed (Emacs 25.1: Use of face escape-glyph on curly quotes is irritating.) |
Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:54:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:52:58 -0700 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#24468: Emacs 25.1: Use of face escape-glyph on curly quotes is irritating. has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24468, regarding Emacs 25.1: Use of face escape-glyph on curly quotes is irritating. to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 24468: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24468 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Emacs 25.1: Use of face escape-glyph on curly quotes is irritating. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:01:01 +0000 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Hello, Emacs. In Emacs 25.1, I am using the info files built for the distribution using texinfo 5 (?or 6). They contain lots of curly quotes. On my Linux virtual terminal, these are all displayed with the escape-glyph, which is irritating in the extreme. The workaround of customizing escape-glyph to the default face would prevent the effect of highlighting things like \377 and ^L, which is the proper use of escape-glyph. The only other workaround I can think of is rebuilding the Emacs info files with texinfo 4, but that is not a long term option. This misuse of the escape-glyph face is hardcoded into startup--setup-quote-display. It shouldn't be. So, I'm reduced to hacking the source code to get what urgently needs to be a user option. Please, can we have this facility, at long last, controlled by a customisable option? -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#24468: Emacs 25.1: Use of face escape-glyph on curly quotes is irritating. Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:52:58 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Eli Zaretskii wrote:> How about 'homo-glyph'? That is more technically accurate anyway, as this > feature is all about homoglyphs.Fine with me, thanks.I installed it as 'homoglyph' via the attached patch, since when I wrote it up 'homo-glyph' was confusing: the English word is 'homoglyph' after all.0001-New-face-homoglyph.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |