[debbugs-tracker] bug#21039: closed (shell-command - bug and workaround.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:01:11 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21039,
regarding shell-command - bug and workaround.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
21039: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21039
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> shell-command - bug and workaround.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 12 Jul 2015 00:01:09 +0300
>
>
>
>
> Hi!
>   Please allow me to refer to my bug report I posted to SBCL bug database:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1470500
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:01:11 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I've read that SBCL bug report, and it involves 2 pieces of
> > software none of which are part of Emacs -- the SBCL binary and SLIME.
> > It could well be due to a bug in either one of these, or both, not in
> > Emacs.  Someone who responded to the bug report claimed that they see
> > the same problem in Emacs without SLIME and SBCL, but provided no
> > details.
> >
> > So I guess we'd like to see a similar problem that involves neither
> > SBCL nor SLIME, and we'd like a recipe for that starting with "emacs -Q",
> > indeed.
>
> No response in over a year, closing.
>
>
> --- End Message ---