[debbugs-tracker] bug#26022: closed (32-bit to 64-bit cross-builds)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:29:53 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26022: 32-bit to 64-bit cross-builds
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26022,
regarding 32-bit to 64-bit cross-builds
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26022: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26022
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: 32-bit to 64-bit cross-builds Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:46:03 +0200 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

Currently in build-aux/hydra we have i686->x86_64 cross-builds disabled,
but this is not the only one we should eliminate. Currently on
core-updates we have armhf->mips64el attempts and also armhf and i686->
aarch64 attemps, all of which fail as expected.

I propose we add two sub-lists of %supported-architectures, 32-bit and
64-bit; we can use them in package difinitions to eliminate 32-bit
architectures from building 64-bit only packages, and use them in
build-aux/hydra to prevent 32-bit -> 64-bit cross-builds.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#26022: 32-bit to 64-bit cross-builds
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:29:53 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Currently in build-aux/hydra we have i686->x86_64 cross-builds disabled,
> > but this is not the only one we should eliminate. Currently on
> > core-updates we have armhf->mips64el attempts and also armhf and i686->
> > aarch64 attemps, all of which fail as expected.
> >
> > I propose we add two sub-lists of %supported-architectures, 32-bit and
> > 64-bit; we can use them in package difinitions to eliminate 32-bit
> > architectures from building 64-bit only packages, and use them in
> > build-aux/hydra to prevent 32-bit -> 64-bit cross-builds.
>
> I believe this if fixed in 9ec2a4d3fec44f08a55df9f5f3d1a04b83e7fcf6, not
> by specifying a list of valid cross-builds, but by fixing the logic in
> the ‘from-32-to-64?’ procedure.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---