[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#26588: closed (Add some (non-free?) font licenses.

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#26588: closed (Add some (non-free?) font licenses.)
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 19:38:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:37:27 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26588,
regarding Add some (non-free?) font licenses.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

26588: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Add some (non-free?) font licenses. Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:46:27 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
The first patch adds Bitstream Vera license, which IMHO is non-free.
Feel free to discuss it though, I'm not sure of the comment I wrote.

The font could be added even though it is non-free because it could be
considered a "Non-fonctional data".  See

The second patch adds Arev license, which is almost like Bitsteam Vera,
and is needed by 0ad-data (which I'm working on).

The third patch fixes font-bitstream-vera, which IMHO erroneously had
X11-style license.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera. Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 21:37:27 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
>> Ok!  Here are two patches: one adds fsdg-compatible, and the other
>> updates the font package.  I'll also send the 0ad update to the 0ad
>> debbugs thread.
> Thanks! These patches LGTM.

I pushed them.  Thank you for the review :-)

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]